Some of Anthony’s notable cases include:

• Representing an Asian State-Owned Entity as lead counsel against two other Asian State-Owned Entities in a tripartite ICC arbitration, seated in Hong Kong. The dispute arose out of an agreement for the transportation of gas and was governed by the national law of one of the parties. Over US$350 million was at stake.
• Representing an Indonesian individual and his family members against a PRC company in two related HKIAC arbitrations seated in Hong Kong. The dispute arose in relation to a mining project. In one arbitration, the governing law of the contract was Chinese, the language of the arbitration was Mandarin Chinese and over US$114 million was at stake. In the other arbitration, the governing law of the contract was Indonesian law, the language of the arbitration was English and over US$84 million was at stake.
• Representing a Vietnamese individual against South Korean private equity firms in an SIAC arbitration seated in Singapore. The dispute arises in the pharmaceutical industry, English law governs the contract and over VND 780 billion / S$40 million is in dispute.
• Representing a major Japanese company as lead counsel against two other major Japanese companies in an SIAC construction dispute. The arbitration is seated in Singapore, applies Vietnamese substantive law and over VND 160 billion / S$8.5 million is in dispute.
• Representing a Malaysian company as lead counsel against a UAE company and its affiliates. The dispute took place across multiple fora, including before an SIAC tribunal seated in Singapore and the Singapore courts. The SIAC arbitration was governed by Singapore law and the amount in dispute was over US$25 million.
• Representing a French-German consortium against a Finnish utility company in an ICC arbitration seated in Stockholm. The dispute arose from an agreement for the construction of a nuclear power plant in Finland and was governed by Finnish law. Over EUR 6.1 billion was at stake.
• Representing an American company as lead counsel in an insurance related ICC arbitration against a Dubai incorporated company. The seat was in Dubai and Dubai law governed the contractual dispute. Over AED 80 million was at stake.
• Representing the subsidiary of an Asian State-owned company in the energy sector as Respondent against its Asian joint venture partners in two parallel ICC arbitrations seated in Singapore. The dispute arose from a joint venture agreement for the development of an oil storage facility and related port facilities in Asia. English law and the law of the Claimants’ State applied. Over US$80 million was at stake.
• Representing a major cryptocurrency exchange as lead counsel in a Singapore seated SIAC arbitration against a Slovenian individual. The dispute was governed by Singapore law.
• Representing a North Asian State-Owned Entity in a SIAC arbitration against a Singaporean counterparty in a Singapore seated commodities related arbitration.
• Representing an Indonesian company as lead counsel in a pharmaceutical related SIAC arbitration against a Hong Kong company. The arbitration applied Indonesian law and was seated in Singapore. The value in dispute was over S$9 million.
• Representing a Singaporean company as lead counsel in an aviation related ICC arbitration against a major French respondent. French law applied to the arbitration, the seat was in Paris and the arbitration was conducted in French.
• Representing Garanti Koza against Turkmenistan in an ICSID investment arbitration. The dispute arose out of the construction of a highway in Turkmenistan. The UK-Turkmenistan BIT applied.
• Representing a Southeast Asian listed company as Claimant in an SIAC arbitration seated in Singapore. The dispute arose in connection with a shipbuilding contract. Singapore law applied and tens of millions of Singapore dollars were at stake.
• Representing an Indian company against a Malaysian company in a telecoms related SIAC arbitration. The seat of the arbitration was Singapore and over US$800 million was at stake.
• Representing a Singaporean company in an ICC arbitration arising out of a Supply Contract for the supply of military technology used in the Middle East.
• Representing a BVI company as lead counsel in a Hong Kong seated HKIAC arbitration against another BVI company in a cryptocurrency related dispute, governed by Hong Kong law.
• Representing investors involved in a fraudulent nickel trading scheme with lost assets valued at over S$35 million before the Singapore courts.
• Advising a major US chemical company in relation to a joint venture agreement with its Asian counterpart. The ICC arbitration was seated in Hong Kong and governed by Hong Kong law.
• Advising a Mongolian State-owned entity in complex negotiations with Rio Tinto regarding the Oyu Tolgoi mining project in Mongolia. The Oyu Tolgoi mine was estimated to account for a third of Mongolia’s GDP in 2020.
• Acting as an independent expert on Singapore arbitration law in Case 166/2564 before Thailand’s Central Intellectual Property and International Trade Court, in relation to the enforcement of a commodities related arbitral award, issued by a Singapore seated tribunal applying Singapore law.
• Acting as sole arbitrator in an SIAC arbitration between Singaporean and Indonesian companies. The value in dispute was around US$500,000.
• Acting as sole arbitrator in an ad hoc arbitration between a South Korean claimant and a Vietnamese respondent. The value in dispute was over US$100,000.
• Acting as sole arbitrator in an ad hoc arbitration between a Singaporean company and Filipino company.
• Acting as sole mediator in a commercial mediation between two Singaporean entities in relation to a luxury vehicle.
• Acting as co-mediator in a dispute concerning the sale and purchase of commercial real estate in Singapore. The value in dispute was around S$1.2 million.
• Acting as co-mediator in a complex commercial mediation between a group of Singaporean medical related companies and a Malaysian investment fund. The value in dispute was around S$4.5 million.
• Assisting an arbitrator in Churchill Mining PLC and Planet Mining Pty Ltd v. Republic of Indonesia, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/14 and 12/40, Hesham T. M. Al Warraq v. Republic of Indonesia, UNCITRAL case, and numerous commercial arbitrations.